On March 13th, before sending it down the memory whole, Brenner's published on his webblog this article written by his Assistant Editor, Fred DeRuvo. :
"Was Sandy Hook a Hoax Designed to Advance Gun Control Laws?"
It's now a big whitewash, but some of the text has been captured:
Now Team Brenner is trying to distance themselves, the link now reads:
Wrongly dated AP photos include those of children allegedly killed in the event, and wrong date stamps for Google pages and searches. It also included photos of 26 young students at Devers Elementary School in York releasing balloons into the air in memory of the young children allegedly slain at Sandy Hook. Another photo shows a banner tied to a freeway overpass with the actual photo allegedly taken December 15, one day after the tragedy. But the actual photo appears to have been taken December 12th. It’s also interesting to note that the banner – while attached to the fence of a freeway overpass – cannot be seen by traffic because it is not on the outside of the fence facing traffic. It is on the inside of the fence on the opposite/far side of the road. Was it simply placed there for the photo and then taken down? It was also an AP photo.
To create an event like Sandy Hook takes tremendous planning. Even so, with the best of minds, things will come to light that at the very least cast a shadow over the truthfulness of said event. We haven’t even discussed what a sharpshooter Adam Lanza must have been to take out that many people in such a short amount of time.
If Sandy Hook was an artificially created and staged event to allow the government to use fear to gain the advantage over the 2nd Amendment, we can bet we will see more of these events over time. Why? Simply because the government has not gotten what it wants.
Though President Obama has stated he supports the 2nd Amendment, it is clear from his actions that he does not. The 2nd Amendment he supports is no 2nd Amendment at all.
Unanswered questions about Sandy Hook and the advancement of gun control
Due to some believing that the writer, Fred DeRuvo, was saying that Sandy Hook was a hoax, this story has been removed from Brenner Brief News. That was never his intent; however, too many are misreading the story to mean that Brenner Brief News and the Brenners believe Sandy Hook to be a hoax.Nothing could be further from the truth. Neither Sara Marie Brenner nor Andrew Brenner believe that Sandy Hook was a hoax. Both have stated as such in the Comments section below the story, as well.
At Brenner Brief News, we allow writers to control their own content. The Brenners are not personally responsible for the content, and only Sara Marie is the only Brenner involved in the operations of the site.
Accusations by The Daily Kos and other outlets that this is “Andrew Brenner’s blog” are outrageously false.
The problem with this "explanation" is screencaptures from social media say otherwise:
What can we find out about Brenner from that(according to a "hooker") "zionist" source of disinfo known as Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Brenner
Andrew O. Brenner (born January 14, 1971) is an American politician. He is a member of the Ohio House of Representatives and a Republican. He was re-elected to represent the 67th district in 2012.[1]A little dull. So much for our "zionist" buddies.
His wife, Sara Marie Brenner, is a Councilwoman and owns Prestige Music Studios, a private music business in Powell, Ohio. Brenner operates the business with his wife. [2][3]
Elsewhere on the Interpools Brenner seems aligned with the Tea Party and like most "teabaggers" he's confused about what socialism is.
Brenner was also a supportor of Rick Santorum, which can't be good for anyone's health due to the likelyhood of laughing oneself to death.
So, if Andy's not a Hooker, how did the article get published on Andy's blog at his website, he and his wife control?
Inquiring minds are accepting conspiracy theories NOW!!!!
