Saturday, March 15, 2014

Andrew Brenner: Tea Party Hooker?

Looks like.

On March 13th, before sending it down the memory whole, Brenner's published on his webblog this article written by his Assistant Editor, Fred DeRuvo. :

"Was Sandy Hook a Hoax Designed to Advance Gun Control Laws?"

 It's now a big whitewash, but some of the text has been captured:

   Wrongly dated AP photos include those of children allegedly killed in the event, and wrong date stamps for Google pages and searches. It also included photos of 26 young students at Devers Elementary School in York releasing balloons into the air in memory of the young children allegedly slain at Sandy Hook. Another photo shows a banner tied to a freeway overpass with the actual photo allegedly taken December 15, one day after the tragedy. But the actual photo appears to have been taken December 12th. It’s also interesting to note that the banner – while attached to the fence of a freeway overpass – cannot be seen by traffic because it is not on the outside of the fence facing traffic. It is on the inside of the fence on the opposite/far side of the road. Was it simply placed there for the photo and then taken down? It was also an AP photo.

    To create an event like Sandy Hook takes tremendous planning. Even so, with the best of minds, things will come to light that at the very least cast a shadow over the truthfulness of said event. We haven’t even discussed what a sharpshooter Adam Lanza must have been to take out that many people in such a short amount of time.

    If Sandy Hook was an artificially created and staged event to allow the government to use fear to gain the advantage over the 2nd Amendment, we can bet we will see more of these events over time. Why? Simply because the government has not gotten what it wants.

    Though President Obama has stated he supports the 2nd Amendment, it is clear from his actions that he does not. The 2nd Amendment he supports is no 2nd Amendment at all.
Now Team Brenner is trying to distance themselves, the link now reads:

Unanswered questions about Sandy Hook and the advancement of gun control

 Due to some believing that the writer, Fred DeRuvo, was saying that Sandy Hook was a hoax, this story has been removed from Brenner Brief News. That was never his intent; however, too many are misreading the story to mean that Brenner Brief News and the Brenners believe Sandy Hook to be a hoax.Nothing could be further from the truth. Neither Sara Marie Brenner nor Andrew Brenner believe that Sandy Hook was a hoax. Both have stated as such in the Comments section below the story, as well.
At Brenner Brief News, we allow writers to control their own content. The Brenners are not personally responsible for the content, and only Sara Marie is the only Brenner involved in the operations of the site.
Accusations by The Daily Kos and other outlets that this is “Andrew Brenner’s blog” are outrageously false.

The problem with this "explanation" is screencaptures from social media say otherwise:

More damning is Andrew Brenner blogged this article himself:

 What can we find out about Brenner from that(according to a "hooker") "zionist" source of disinfo known as Wikipedia:

Andrew O. Brenner (born January 14, 1971) is an American politician. He is a member of the Ohio House of Representatives and a Republican. He was re-elected to represent the 67th district in 2012.[1]
His wife, Sara Marie Brenner, is a Councilwoman and owns Prestige Music Studios, a private music business in Powell, Ohio. Brenner operates the business with his wife. [2][3]
A little dull.  So much for our "zionist" buddies.

Elsewhere on the Interpools Brenner seems aligned with the Tea Party and like most "teabaggers" he's confused about what socialism is.

Brenner was also a supportor of Rick Santorum,  which can't be good for anyone's health due to the likelyhood of laughing oneself to death.

So, if Andy's not a Hooker, how did the article get published on Andy's blog at his website, he and his wife control?

Inquiring minds are accepting conspiracy theories NOW!!!!

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Unhinged Hooker "Kelly From Tusla" on Radio

For laughs listen to how Schnitt  handles this 'Hooker':

December 04, 2013 - Conspiracy Nut Caller Tulsa Kelly


Kelly from Tusla's other "work" :

motorfotDecember 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM
Kelly from Tulsa was great! One of the clearest thinking guests on this show, ever. Great scientific mind.

AyelyahMay 4, 2013 at 1:36 AM
excellent work Kelly, you pieced it together superbly, just goes to prove what determination and tenacity can can achieve, no qualifications are necessary. There is no other conclusion apart from this being a planned, staged and scripted event, Hollywood gone live, Director and all. It begs the question who wrote the script and financed this fiasco?
Awake in MichiganMay 6, 2013 at 6:52 PM
Love your work, Kelly. Received more out of your words at second listening. "Gene Rosen in his house juicing up kids..." hahahahahahahaha. How can the powers-that-say-they-are ponder we believe all this b---sh--.
spinchatter5May 7, 2013 at 11:06 AM
I don't mean to be morbid, but I hope Kelly has shared with you, Jim, her sources on the smoking gun she's working on. After all, how many witnesses/investigators digging around stories like this have ended up "suicided"?

Unfortunately for the rest of us the New World Order assassin  thugs failed to keep Kelly from her insane rant ridden radio appearance in Dec.

Shit, what do we pay these people for?

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Refuting Wolfgang Halbig, a Sandy Hook “truther”

Great point by point evisceration of  Hooker tool Wolfgang Halbig by Chris Hernandez:

[Edited for space.  Read the full context at above link.]


Point 1: “When the police arrived at Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES) that morning, they parked ¼ mile from the school’s front door instead of doing what first responders are supposed to do in an active shooter event, which is to neutralize the threat as quickly as possible so as to save as many lives as possible.”

When the official Sandy Hook report was released, I also heard rumors of officers parking a quarter mile away. But some of the responding officers have publicly stated they stopped in the school parking lot, rather than a faraway safe spot.
“They made it in under three minutes, arriving in the parking lot while gunfire could still be heard. ‘I got out of the car and grabbed my rifle and it stopped for a second,’ Officer Chapman said. ‘But then we heard more popping. You could tell it was rifle fire. And it was up so close, it sounded like it was coming from outside. So we were all looking around for someone to shoot back at.’”

Point 2: “Paramedics and EMTs (emergency medical technicians) were not allowed to enter the school. Instead they were kept waiting in the Sandy Hook fire station nearby, 500 yards down the road from SHES.”

This is kind of a “Wow, no kidding” statement. EMS protocol has traditionally been to remain out of the immediate danger area until it’s been declared safe by law enforcement. So it’s believable that EMS wasn’t allowed into the school until police cleared it. Whether that was a bad call or not (I think it was), it’s not the least bit suspicious.

Point 3: “Trauma helicopters, which can provide the quickest and best medical services in an emergency, were not sent to Sandy Hook. Life Star, the medical helicopter service at Danbury Hospital’s Trauma Center, told Halbig ‘we were never called, never asked.’”

In decades as a cop, having been on many shootings, stabbings and major accidents, I can only recall medical helicopters being called in on a few occasions. Helicopters require cleared landing zones, which often means clearing traffic from vital roads. This can’t always be done in an urban area, or at least it can’t always be done quickly. Transportation by road is sometimes faster than by air, when the time needed to get the helicopters into the air, clear a landing zone and move casualties to the LZ is taken into account. Ground ambulances can usually get casualties to a closeby hospital before a helicopter can be brought in.
And there are only so many helicopters available. Even if they had been called, some (maybe most) of the casualties would have been transported by ground anyway.

Point 4: “Where were the ambulances to transport the wounded to hospitals?”
Didn’t he just answer his own question? The ambulances were at the Newtown fire station, as mentioned in point 2.

Point 5: “Why did police declare 26 people to be dead within the first 11 minutes of the shooting, when according to Connecticut law, only a doctor can declare someone to be legally dead?”

What difference does that make? I’ve been on plenty of scenes where cops declared someone “DRT”, meaning “Dead Right There”. That’s not an official pronouncement, it’s the officer reporting what’s obvious to him or her. I once found a man who had been dead in his house for at least a week, and I reported him dead on the radio. The man was badly decomposed, obviously dead, but someone else still had to make the official pronouncement. On another call we had someone decapitated by an air bag. Yes we called them dead, and yes someone else had to make the official pronouncement. That’s not suspicious, it’s just legal procedure.

Point 6: “Why did the FBI classify the Sandy Hook massacre? This has never been done before. Even the Columbine School massacre was not classified information. To this day, the FBI report on Sandy Hook remains classified information, not releasable to the public.”

I don’t know anything about the FBI’s report. I do know that the FBI’s report isn’t the determining factor in whether or not this incident really happened. Local and state officers responded and investigated, and their report has been released. Some of the responding officers have spoken publicly about the incident. Radio and 911 transcripts have been released. Parents have made statements. So if the FBI doesn’t release their report, suddenly the entire incident was faked?

Point 7: “Why did the State of Connecticut wait ELEVEN whole months to issue its official final report on the Sandy Hook shootings to the American public? Note that the final report does not include the FBI’s still-classified report.”

Why did the investigation take eleven months? Probably because it was extremely complicated, with two murder scenes, one of which was more complex than any those officers had previously encountered. And that each of the twenty-seven murders had to be individually and exhaustively detailed. And that there was no rush to finish, because there was nobody alive to prosecute, so no concern about a “speedy trial”. And that the investigators knew their report would be torn apart by legions of “truthers” intent on exploiting anything from typographical errors to 30-second timeline mistakes.
Point 8: “Police transmissions don’t lie because they are made by sworn and trained law enforcement officers. On the morning of Dec. 14, 2012, recorded police transmissions said ‘We have multiple weapons inside the [SH] classroom — a rifle and a shotgun.’ But nobody could find the shotgun in the school. Instead, a shotgun was found in the black Honda parked outside the school.”

Oh, brother. This statement makes me question Halbig’s exalted background as a police officer. Any cop who has been on more than one dangerous, adrenaline-charged scene knows officers make mistakes. Suspects are misidentified. People see things that aren’t really there. Cops call out bad directions (I was famous for that). Someone yells something that turns out to not be true and others repeat it. How many officers have reported seeing a weapon, suspicious object, suspicious person or whatever, and later found out they were wrong? Does anyone recall the search for the nonexistent third suspect at the North Hollywood Shootout?
I haven’t heard the radio traffic about two weapons, but if it happened, so what? I’m not the least bit surprised an officer called out something that turned out to be incorrect. It happens all the time. And it’s usually a result of adrenaline, fear, confusion, conflicting witness reports and everything else that cops encounter at high-stress scenes. If Halbig doesn’t know that, then I suspect that during his time as a “cop” he rode a desk far more than a patrol car.
Besides that, it’s pretty damn ridiculous for Halbig to cite the professionalism of police officers while simultaneously accusing every police officer involved in the Sandy Hook investigation of being part of this “conspiracy”.

Point 9: “At 9:45 AM that day, a police officer found a surviving kindergarten-aged girl in the hallway. The officer sent her back into Room 8 — a crime scene with students and teachers shot dead. What police officer would do that?”

Probably an officer who thought, “The room we just searched is clear, but the rest of the school isn’t. I don’t have extra people around to guard this girl or take her to safety. And there may be a suspect still loose in the school. So I should send her back into a safe room, and report her location on the radio.” Ordering her back into that room was probably the best bad option out of a list of bad options.
This comment reminds me of a debate I had before I deployed to Iraq. According to traditional military doctrine, you never, under any circumstances, evacuated a wounded soldier with a dead soldier. In the early years of the Iraq War some soldiers tried to hold on to that doctrine. But it didn’t always make sense. If a Humvee was hit by an IED and all the crewmen were killed or wounded, and they were under small arms fire, it wouldn’t make sense to have other soldiers make multiple trips into the kill zone when they can evacuate everyone at once. You make one trip in, load everyone you can, and get out. Sometimes war just sucks, and you have to do what you have to do.

Point 10: “Similarly, that morning, two Connecticut state troopers entered Room 10 and found an unharmed boy hiding in the bathroom. The troopers ordered the boy to stay in the room — a room with dead people. ‘That’s not police protocol.’”

See my above comment. Sure, that’s not protocol. So what? Does Halbig, with his alleged police background, think cops or anyone else always follow protocol? Amazingly enough, sometimes people don’t exactly follow the training they’ve received. I’m sure everyone reading this would be shocked – shocked! – to hear that teenagers still drive like idiots even after being taught not to. Or that soldiers don’t always hit their targets even after extensive marksmanship training. Or that cops, in the most terrifying, intense, chaotic, confusing scene they’ve ever been on, when they’re experiencing survival stress reactions like tunnel vision, auditory exclusion, time speeding up or slowing down, enhanced visual acuity and loss of manual dexterity, might not follow their training to the letter.
Cops are human. I can pretty much guarantee that none of officers at Newtown had responded to anything like the Sandy Hook massacre before. In the heat of the moment, they didn’t exactly follow protocol. Surprised? Me neither.

Point 11: “’Having investigated and given expert testimony on many school shootings, Halbig says ‘I know what tears look like.’ But the parents of slain Sandy Hook children, as we’ve noted here on FOTM, did not cry. (In the now famous case of Robbie Parker, the father of allegedly slain 6-year-old Emilie, he went from laughing and joking to pretending to choke back tears in the blink of an eye.)”

No joke? Not a single parent of a murdered child from Sandy Hook cried? Who the hell are these people then?

And I’d like to know how Halbig or anyone else knows the parent mentioned above was “pretending to choke back tears”. I’ve been around plenty of family members of murder victims, and it’s not unusual for them to go through intense mood swings.

Point 12: “Sandy Hook’s medical examiner Dr. Wayne Carver refused to let the parents see the bodies of their slain children, and instead gave them photos of the bodies, which is ‘unheard of.’ Halbig knows about the inconsolable grief of parents and is himself a parent. Parents whose children had been shot dead ‘would kick the door down’ demanding to see the bodies.”

I’ve never been on a scene where family members were allowed to see the bodies of murder victims. When the bodies are still where they fell, the area around them needs to remain as undisturbed as possible in order to preserve evidence. Until a body is examined and autopsied, the body itself is evidence that needs to be preserved. People not involved in the investigation aren’t allowed to see murder victims at will, they generally won’t see the body until it’s released to a funeral home after the autopsy.

Point 13: “Why was Sandy Hook Elementary School torn down? This is not the case with any of the other schools where shootings had taken place, including Columbine School.”

In this case, the community decided they didn’t want to continue using the school where 20 children and 6 educators were murdered. I don’t find that particularly surprising. Columbine High School wasn’t torn down, but its library, where the majority of victims died, was walled off.

Point 14: “Who installed the new security system at SHES? This should be a matter of public record.”

If it was a contract made by the city, then I imagine it is a matter of public record. What difference does that make? The security system didn’t enable or stop the massacre, and the school’s locked doors were an easily surmountable obstacle to Lanza. If we don’t know who installed the security system, does that signify something?

Point 15: “The shooting-to-death of 26 people would leave 45-60 gallons of blood. Who cleaned it up? What biohazard company was hired to clean the crime scene?”

Wait…what? According to, a 150-pound body contains approximately 5.5 quarts of blood. With 26 victims that’s 143 quarts. Four quarts make a gallon, so 143 quarts of blood equals 35.75 gallons. And that’s if they were all adults. Children’s bodies hold less blood.
But that doesn’t matter, because when people are shot to death all their blood doesn’t automatically drain from their bodies. Halbig has either never been on a shooting murder scene or he’s completely forgotten what they look like. People bleed out because they have massive injuries and their hearts pump blood out from those injuries. When the heart stops pumping, the blood loss stops. I’ve seen some big pools of blood, but other than in a few serial murderer cases never heard of a murder victim being totally drained of blood.
Yes, that would have been a hell of a mess to clean up, even without the mythical “45-60 gallons of blood”. Was it cleaned up afterward? I don’t know. The school was never reopened, so did it need to be cleaned?

Point 16: “Why is there not even one lawsuit by a Sandy Hook parent against SHES for negligence? Halbig has never ever seen a school shooting without parents suing the school for negligence.”

Is it possible the parents really don’t blame the school for the mentally ill murderer who shot his way through locked doors, killed educators who tried to save their children, then murdered as many people as he could before shooting himself?

Point 17: “Why are there so many fund-raisers for the Sandy Hook shootings? Halbig: ‘I’ve never seen so many fund-raisers’ in the case of Sandy Hook. One fundraising alone, by United Way, netted $17 million, from which ‘every [SH] parent got a big chunk of money.’”

Okay. People donated funds to assist families whose children were brutally murdered. Obviously the incident never happened, because the United Way and others raised money. This proves that United Way was involved in the conspiracy.

I’m just not seeing a reason to throw out a conspiracy flag because Americans raised money to help families who had just suffered unimaginable tragedy.

Point 18: “Alleged shooter Adam Lanza, 20, is said to have Asperger syndrome — a high-functioning (in academics) form of austism. Halbig points out, however, that like those with autism, children with Asperger have ‘very very poor motor skills’ and ‘very poor muscle tone.’ How did Asperger-afflicted Adam Lanza with ‘very poor muscle tone’ carry a rifle, a shotgun, a handgun, and bullets? How did Asperger-afflicted Adam Lanza with ‘very very poor motor skills’ shoot 26 people dead — not wounded — in less than five minutes, firing one bullet roughly every two seconds?”

Unfortunately, I know a lot about autism. My youngest son is moderately autistic. Anyone who thinks everyone on the autism spectrum is affected the same doesn’t understand autism. Yes, some people with autism have poor muscle tone and poor motor skills. That doesn’t mean they can’t operate a weapon. My five year old son could probably hold and fire a rifle (his motor skills are just fine, by the way). There is no reason to believe Lanza was so weak physically that he couldn’t operate a rifle, or carry spare ammunition.

Halbig’s conclusions: “’In my professional opinion [as a school safety consultant], I suspect Sandy Hook was a scripted event that took place, in the planning for two or 2½ years.’…Halbig does not believe any child was killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School.”

Halbig sounds like a typical “truther”; he assumes our government, the same government absolutely incapable of even putting a health care website together, can pull off a gigantic conspiracy requiring thousands of willing participants. And these participants wouldn’t all be shadowy, ghostlike federal government Jason Bourne spies, either. Local cops and firefighters, the very people who serve and live in the small community where the massacre was “staged”, would have to willingly lie to the entire nation about it. Children who attended the school would have to lie. All the teachers would have to lie. Local officials would have to willingly play along with a narrative they know is false. People who live near the school would have to lie about hearing gunfire and having children knocking on their doors asking for help. And all these various disparate people, all the cops, firefighters, paramedics, doctors, neighbors, parents, reporters, all the thousands of people associated with the incident, are all in on the conspiracy? They were all part of this “scripted event”, they all knew in advance it was fake? Or did they spontaneously jump into the conspiracy at the first opportunity?

Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure many people did immediately recognize an opportunity to exploit the tragedy for political gain. Some of them doubtless believe in the morality of their cause, some others probably see it as a way to consolidate their own or their party’s power. But exploiting a tragedy isn’t the same thing as faking it.
The bottom line for me is that I don’t believe a bunch of regular, everyday Americans are lying about this. Why would they? Why would guys just like the cops I’ve served with for decades, teachers like my mom, sister and wife, and paramedics like the guys I’ve seen frantically trying to save strangers on many scenes, willingly lie about this? According to Halbig and every truther who agrees with him, not a single child died at Sandy Hook that day. So every cop on that scene lied about dead children they knew weren’t there. Every paramedic who claimed to have treated a victim knows there were no victims. Every neighbor who reported hearing gunfire knows not a shot was fired. Everyone who worked at Sandy Hook, every student there, knows nobody was murdered. But they’re all in on the lie anyway. Because they all passionately want gun control. Or something like that.

Halbig is reportedly going to travel to Newtown himself, so he can ask questions “eyeball to eyeball”. I’d highly suggest he carry a first aid kit. Because if I had lost a son or daughter at Sandy Hook, and some “truther” came around accusing me of lying about the brutal murder of my own child, I know exactly how I’d react.

 Outstanding, sir.

Friday, March 7, 2014

Linked at Facebook on Pier's Morgan Live

Apparently a Hooker called Tommy was spreading the bad word on the Pier's Morgan Live Facebook page.

Tommy Castillo posted a link to PiersMorgan Live's timeline.
Mr. Halbig’s response is demand for criminal arrests of “leaders” involved in Sandy Hook based on rational embrace of the public...
 Like · · Share · March 5 at 11:23am
 The Hooker blog is called "Washington's Blog" and the blog post was written by Carl Herman.  He seems to be very, very excited about political "game changers".  The blog has multiple contributors with links to a medly of politics mostly left, but a couple with wacky woo, like the conspiracy website and the Anti Semitic cesspool "What Really Happened" run by Mike Rivero.  Back in 2002 Rivero's website was connected to some questionable business dealings, as well as being responsible for spreading a vicious, inflammatory, political lie:
More troubling was this brazen misquote caught by sharp-eyed blogger, Damian Penny:
20.5.02This is long overdue, but CAMERA, a pro-Israel media watchdog, has confirmed that Ariel Sharon's "We, the Jewish people, control America" quote is a hoax.
(I sent this article to Michael Rivero, who repeats the quote 5 or 6 times a day. Let's see if he responds.)

No surprise people still plugging these woo websites have fallen for the Hooker crap.
Cue for upstanding fan Roni to set Hooker Tommy linking to this blog. 
March 5 at 11:48am · Like · 1

While lukewarmly received, we're not sad.  The Hookers aren't trending like they were and if they do, peeps like Roni will keep our search results high.

Thanks for the plug.

Wolfgang Halbig: Children's Safety Institute Website Down

It's not the first time to cross our minds something was a sham around Halbig.  After today's announcement Halbig was fired/or something, peeps on both sides of the Hooker non-debate have noticed Halbig's site  is down:

Server not found
 Whois shows it's still registered and no one updated:

Registry Domain ID:
Registrar WHOIS Server:
Registrar URL:
Updated Date: 2013-10-31T00:00:00Z
Creation Date: 2012-10-29T00:00:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2014-10-29T00:00:00Z
Registrar IANA ID: 2
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 800-333-7680
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Childrens Safety Institute
Registrant Organization: Childrens Safety Institute
Registrant Street: PO Box 459
Registrant City: Drums
Registrant State/Province: PA
Registrant Postal Code: 18222
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: 570-708-8780
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email:
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Childrens Safety Institute
Admin Organization: Childrens Safety Institute
Admin Street: PO Box 459
Admin City: Drums
Admin State/Province: PA
Admin Postal Code: 18222
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: 570-708-8780
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email:
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Childrens Safety Institute
Tech Organization: Childrens Safety Institute
Tech Street: PO Box 459
Tech City: Drums
Tech State/Province: PA
Tech Postal Code: 18222
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: 570-708-8780
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email:
DNSSEC: not signed
 The server in Florida is still live:

Server Type:
IP Address: Reverse-IP | Ping | DNS Lookup | Traceroute
Whois Server:
United States AS33182 --No Registry Entry-- (registered Oct 20, 2004)
IP Location:
United States - Florida - Orlando - Inc.
Response Code:
Domain Status:
Registered And Active Website
So we're guessing someone temporarily pulled the plug.
The lack of a simple html info page suggests great drama behind the scenes:
Did Halbig do it to stop  peeps using the website contact?
Or did Halbig's ex business partner(s) do it to cut Hooker donors off from using the site, and therefore ensuring they all stay out of jail?

Thank God for Google Cache:
Our Mission

CSI’s mission is to provide the leading training programs and tools for teachers to properly care for children with Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities.
Contact Us
5703 Red Bug Lake Road Suite 103

Winter Springs, FL 32709
Our Story

Mission Statement: “CSI’s mission is to provide the leading training programs and tools for teachers to properly care for children with Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities.” We strongly believe there are better ways to care for children with special needs when their behavior becomes unruly due to over-stimulation of their classroom environment or school settings.
Christopher Elliott

Christopher Elliott- Chris is a member of the National Urban Special Education Leadership Initiative and part of a national faculty sponsored by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). Chris has been a special educator for twenty years with experience as a residential counselor, classroom assistant, transition coordinator, school district staffing specialist, and classroom teacher. He is currently a Doctoral candidate at the University of Central Florida with research interests including social and interpersonal skills development for student with disabilities, transition services, public policy advancement, job experience training programs, math education, and autism related disorders. Chris is well respected in the field of special education and has many years working and observing behavioral tendencies of children with special needs. His experience working in both public and private organizations makes him well respected among his educational peers. This allows him to teach his fellow educators new methods in handling children’s behavioral issues. Chris is passionate about Universal Design for Learning, Behavior Support Strategies, Inclusive School Community Models, and Staff Development. Chris holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Rehabilitation Counseling from Springfield College, MA, and a Master’s Degree in Special Education from the University of Colorado. He lives in Orlando Florida with his wife and twin sons.
Wolfgang W. Halbig

Wolfgang is a nationally recognized school safety and security professional who has done extensive work in researching and developing the “Standards for Safe Schools”. He is an expert witness in the field of school safety and security. He has testified before a Congressional Commission studying school safety and security. Wolfgang was the former Executive Director of the National Institute for School and Workplace Safety. Wolfgang was also appointed by the Florida Governor to serve on the State of Florida Safe Schools Commission.

Wolfgang is also the author of a book for educators and school bus drivers on aggressive behavior management and the use of reasonable force, as well as numerous magazine articles. His article on “Breaking the Code of Silence” was published in the March 2000 edition of the American School Board Journal. He has been a featured guest on many national news programs including Dateline NBC, Good Morning America, and MSNBC.

Wolfgang was the Director of Safety and Security for a large public school system in Florida and brings to the company a national reputation in school safety, education and law enforcement. He has experience with U.S. Customs and as a Florida State Trooper. After leaving law enforcement, he went into education as a teacher, administrative leader, and finally Director of Safety and Security. His 35 years of work experience is a major asset to any involvement with safety and security.
William J. Ford

William J. Ford- Bill grew up in Central Florida and in 1979 he received a Bachelor’s Degree in Marketing/Management from the University of Central Florida. The same year he began his security career. He traveled the country visiting over 147 security operations to introduce new and innovative security ideas and initiatives to those outdated security companies.

In 1983 Bill purchased his own security operation in Orlando, FL. Bill was responsible for all aspects of the business; he integrated his business knowledge into the daily solutions that he and his team provided to the community they served. He continued pioneering different technical advancements in audio and visual monitoring making them the nation’s leader in central station monitoring. They set the monitoring standards to lead the nation in school safety initiatives for over twenty years. He became to be known as the security and safety expert for educational facilities since he secured more educational facilities than any other single security provider. He sold his security firm in 2006 after 27 years in the security business but never lost his thirst for safety. He continues to speak on security and safety related issues and consults for many organizations.
These look like the people un happy with Halbig trying to hijack the org for his Hooker woo.

Fun times ahead!


The honeymoon is over and Halbig is out of a job, or out of business. Or just out of his mind. As if things weren't bad enough, his caps lock is stuck:


And he needs an editor.   It's not clear if he means he has to shut down the business, downsize himself or what.  But we're supposed to feel bad for him:

Brent Devlin Hmmm...I smell bs ..
3 hours ago · 4
Michael W. Lurie Wolf, you have gained - not lost - your team. You'll see...
3 hours ago · 5
TK Cashwell People everywhere need to seriously check their priorities.
3 hours ago · 1
Lori Ranney
3 hours ago
Artcraft Printing all it takes for evil to prevail is that good men stand by and do nothing.
3 hours ago · 9
Glen Hale A situation like this is when you find out who your true friends are , like a divorce people will avoid you thinking you will run off with their wife. Stand up for what you believe and if any thing happens a lot will be asking a lot more questions..when the shooting starts things go wrong after the first bullet , make them fight on their knees.
3 hours ago · 3
Lois Endress Dial well .. I'm sorry to hear this ..Looks like he wasn't what you thought he was .. If people who know you personally and know your character are willing to distance themselves over a disagreement in politics or ideas then they weren't that supportive as you thought.
And Brend Devlin .. you smell BS? yeah.
3 hours ago · 2

 Lois has reading comprehension problems.  Halbig himself said the dispute was about donations, not politics or ideas:


Less understanding people, familiar with anti-Trust law, might smell money laundering.
Erik, are you paying attention?  Still want to run with these loons?

Another Hooker looks like he gets it and wants Halbig to STFU:
Tony Coty Wolfgang W Halbig you are diverging and not staying focused on your mission. I think this matter with your friend needs to be a private matter that doesn't have to be posted. Sorry, but as honest as you are, I feel I need to be honest with you on your posting irrelevant subject matter to the Sandy Hook investigation.

Stay focused Wolfgang, don't fall into the trap of being distracted by friends, Comcast, or even the CT police. Just do what you set out to do, and avoid the collateral information that is not germane to your mission.
Sorry, Tony, the "mission" includes taking donations, so Halbig is "on topic".  If you Hookers wanted to keep it private, mebbe shouldn't have been using Halbig's biz to funnel funds.  Then he wouldn't have to explain why he can't do it any more.

Thanks for playing.

Calling Erik Pearson

While Wolfgang Halbig is off to annoy the fine folks of Connecticut, we thought we'd take some time to see what makes Erik Pearson tick.     Taking a cues from commenters, we're considering the possibility that Pearson is, for lack of a better word, a patsy.

Admittedly he doesn't seem like a bad guy, a little rough around the edges, but, unlike Tony, doesn't have a rap sheet for anything serious (that we know of). After some discussion with outsiders, it was pointed out we don't want to radicalize "Hookers" who are just misguided and drive them into the arms of the crazy crazies.  So we'll back off of Hookers who are just dumb, and save the big guns for the white power, pro nazi freaks or peeps harrassing the survivors.  or peeps talking responsibility for creating Hooker platform.

Which brings us back to Erik. As misguided as he might be, he's still providing a platform for these lies.

We'd be interested in exactly how Erik got involved in the "Hooker" conspiracy.  Where did he first hear about it?  Why did it make sense to him?

Looking at the record, the Facebook page Erik runs has been through a couple of revisions.  On Feb 14th of this year the about page read:

This is Google's cache of It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Feb 16, 2014 11:17:26 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.

Sandy Hook Hoax

Basic Info
Launched January 1, 2013
Contact Info

Uncovering the TRUTH behind the Sandy Hook massacre.
We at SHH do NOT claim that the shootings did not take place and that people did not die. We are collecting evidence that points towards a discrepancy in what we have been told by the media, government and law enforcement. We present that evidence and let YOU make an informed decision.

If you are offended by this page, do NOT click LIKE. You are free to state your opinion on the matter.

Verbal attacks and name calling need to be taken to PM's. Any attempts at questioning the integrity of this page or it's administrators may result in your removal. No warnings other than this will be given. Failure to follow this policy may result in you being banned from this page.

You will get banned is if you are using an obvious fake profile in order to bypass a previous ban.

EVERYONE is free to speak their mind and ask any questions they like here.

We do not condone or endorse anyone from this page going onto a memorial page and berating it's members.

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to PM the page and one of our ADMIN's will reply.

If anyone wants to email us instead of posting on Facebook, you can email us at

The S.H.H. Admins are:


More recently the page reads:

Basic Info
Launched January 1, 2013
Contact Info

Uncovering the TRUTH behind the Sandy Hook massacre.
We at SHH do NOT claim that the shootings did not take place and that people did not die. We are collecting evidence that points towards a discrepancy in what we have been told by the media, government and law enforcement. We present that evidence and let YOU make an informed decision.

If you are offended by this page, do NOT click LIKE. You are free to state your opinion on the matter.

Verbal attacks and name calling need to be taken to PM's. Any attempts at questioning the integrity of this page or it's administrators may result in your removal. No warnings other than this will be given. Failure to follow this policy may result in you being banned from this page.

You will get banned is if you are using an obvious fake profile in order to bypass a previous ban.

EVERYONE is free to speak their mind and ask any questions they like here.

We do not condone or endorse anyone from this page going onto a memorial page and berating it's members.

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to PM the page and one of our ADMIN's will reply.

If anyone wants to email us instead of posting on Facebook, you can email us at

We have spent 15 months investigating this event and there have been many people that have changed their minds multiple times. Those that believe this event happened as reported should have a chance to tell us WHY in a civil manner.

I'm sure there will be a few opposing views that are about to be posted. Please offer them the same respect you would want them to offer you.

This does NOT mean we will put up with obvious distractions and insults. If the conversation lends itself to name calling and personal attacks those posts will be removed. Any repeated actions will result in a permanent removal.

If you feel like you cannot carry on a conversation without resorting to attacks, we ask that you stay quiet or take it to PM's.

The S.H.H. Admins are:


They got another admin and some more flavor text.  Yay.  
What jumps out is this copypasta:

We at SHH do NOT claim that the shootings did not take place and that people did not die.
The problem, Erik:  most of the people supporting your page, your "cause" and all of the people who invented...that's right INVENTED...the conspiracy ARE saying no one died.  That means by promoting the Hooker conspiracy you, Erik, are promoting the claims no one died.

Let's quote(again) the Hooker founder, in a comment he made at your own blog, Erik:
Jim FetzerDecember 21, 2013 at 8:16 AM
Sandy Hook was a gun-contol psy-op at least two years in the planning. What we are being told here offers further confirmation that this was an elaborate, carefully controlled drill to promote a political agenda. See and watch Sofia Smallstorm's "Unraveling Sandy Hook", which I embed there.
Now think, Erik, if this was a psyop planned for two years, where's the evidence?  The shootings happened in late 2012.  That means Fetzer is saying they were being planned in 2010.  Ask him what his evidence is.  Not a fracking video; just explain when it was being planned in 2010.  Should be easy.  Or not.
Remember, this guy first claimed Sandy Hook was caused by Mossad:
Mossad death squads slaughtered American children at Sandy Hook
Erik, what this guy is doing is playing to an extreme racist fringe crowd.  The type of crowd that gives red neck a bad name.  And he totally changed the story:
First it was Mossad death squads. 
Then it was a "psyop" in the making since 2010?
Fetzer changed his story again this year, accusing the school board of a cover up:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:23 AM, James Fetzer <> wrote:

Dear Newtown School Board Members,

As a former Marine Corps officer, retired university professor and especially as a journalist for Veterans Today, who has published several articles about the Sandy Hook event, I would like to have your response to what Wolfgang Halbig has addressed to you. Wolf is a former Florida State Trooper, a former school principal and a nationally recognized expert on school safety. Are you going to respond to his inquiries or will you pretend you never received them?

There are multiple indications that you, the Newtown School Board, have been participating in a cover up of what took place at Sandy Hook Elementary School. As we have observed in

“Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax” (with Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy and other members of the Sandy Hook Research Group), the evidence is simply overwhelming that what happened was a carefully staged drill and not an actual shooting.

The questions that Wolfgang has raised are important ones, especially about the event itself but also about the building, which have been reported in articles that have appeared in the press, including “Widespread Haz-Mat Presence Would Have Hampered Sandy Hook Renovations” by John Voket (2 December 2013), which appeared in The Newtown Bee. And of course First Selectman Pat Llorda has been quoted thanking the press for its coverage of the Newtown event.

The questions that Wolfgang has raised about Sandy Hook Elementary School are obvious and elementary. As a journalist who has published and will continue to publish about this event, I want to be sure that I have my facts straight. So be sure to include me in your response to Wolfgang. And if you were not participating in a massive hoax to mislead the American people, inquiring minds want to know.

Thanks for a prompt response.


James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
McKnight Professor Emeritus
University of Minnesota Duluth

Erik, you don't think you're a "sheep", but if you don't question why this ringleader/expert keeps changing his story, you will be a sheep.

Think about that.  
And think about what Halbig's doing and how he's raising money:

To all my new friends and Sandy Hook Puzzle Solvers:

I will be traveling to Hartford and Newtown shortly to inspect the United Way Western Ct Charity funds records as to who got what and what did they provide them United Way that proves that they deserve those funds such as a death certificate.

I am sure you don't just pay out $300,000 to someone just on their word or news paper articles.

It's all about accountability.

They should have issued everyone a 1099 since it is not an Insurance settlement?

I made a promise and if you will only help because the attorney costs money.
 Erik, didn't you feel uneasy about the Sandy Hook survivors taking donations?  Well, how much more sleazy is this fund raiser?

Todd V. Swearingen-djAngel Money is on the way... from me
9 hours ago · 1
Nick Ibanez What's ur paypal email, I want to donate to the fund
9 hours ago
Kevin Kelly Someone hook up Wolfgang W Halbig with a PayPal account!
9 hours ago · 2
Wolfgang W Halbig We will have a web-site called SANDY HOOK JUSTICE with a Pay Pal account finally...wolf
9 hours ago · 22

Kurtis Gaskin I am in. This is too important to be cheap
9 hours ago · 3

Jolie Joseph Rahn Is your paypal page up, yet Wolgang? Eagerly waiting.

David Weiss I sent $100 via PayPal to If you want to donate now send what you can to that email address.
8 hours ago · 3

David Weiss Wolfgang the donation page with the paypal link is just going to link to your email address so there is no reason for people to wait to donate. Even if you decide to use a separate email address it does t matter they will all link together and be totally accountable.

David Weiss Everyone send him money so he can afford to take some security with him. If you can't afford $100 send him $5 or what ever you can.
8 hours ago · 6
Tonya Chandler Graham David how do I know this is his paypal account for sure?
7 hours ago · 1
David Weiss Ask him.
7 hours ago
David Weiss Wolfgang W Halbig please tell everyone what your email address is and they will send you money.
7 hours ago · 1
Tonya Chandler Graham ok I did waiting for a reply Thankyou I really want to send money through paypal
7 hours ago
David Weiss He has posted his email address in other posts. I convinced him to use paypal and sent him money to show how easy it was.
7 hours ago
Neil Wolfe send him cash- keep the IRS off his back- cash=no paper trail- OMG did I say that? I did indeed : )
6 hours ago · 1
David Weiss I don't trust the US mail to deliver cash or checks to him. To away for them to intercept. Remember this is way bigger than anyone is currently thinking.
Do you people have any idea how wide open this is to fraud and money laundering?   Erik, you barely know these people.  Your co administrators have a dim idea something's wrong, but it like trying to put out a fire with a water gun and arguing what color of plastic is better. 

You people are missing the point: the Hooker conspiracy is a scam.
No amount of donations will bring you closer to the "truth".  But you will help Fetzer's and company make more money for a while....

Talk to you soon, Erik.

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Sandy Hook Truth Exposed

Let's give our fellow anti-Hookers pals a big hand and a big plug:

Sandy Hook Truth Exposed

 They're new on the anti-Hooker scene, just revving up this year.  While we had some fun being mistaken for each other, and drawing it out for the lulz had some appeal, we decided showing the Hookers there is a growing front of people ready to call their bullshit out for what it is:

 Especially if they keep spreading this stuff at Facebook.

Of course confirmation there is more than one blog "after them"  will just confirm Cointelpro/NWO/Mossad have even MORE assets than they thought...

Why the growth in anti Hooker platforms?  From the department of informed speculation:

The initial Hooker star rose and fell by the middle of 2013.  Thoroughly debunked on all fronts, the real press has abandoned the Hookers as a story, barring future publicity stunts.  

But still the march on.  After being roundly dismissed even in woo circles, a clique of veteran conspiracy clowns reworked their schtick, roped in Wolfgang Halbig and lauched the Hooker reboot this year.

Those of us who thought it was over, found ourselves Facebooked and Tweeted to death out of the blue:  WTF?  This shit again?
Looks like the Hookers plan to milk this for all their worth, dragging more gullible semi employed peeps in for cannon fodder.

Now let's look at an except from the SHTE latest blog:

"Not the first time Sandy Hook denial has crossed paths with Holocaust denial."
As they say a picture is worth a thousand words:

"Sandy hook fake 9-11 fake. Boston fake.  Jews dying in gas chambers F-A-K-E."
Godwin would be proud. 
We don't think this is a coincidence.  Remember Halbig's friend and fan Kristine Kelly?  She believes "the Jews", or at least Israel, is behind gun control:

[Full disclosure: we're generally politically liberal and don't think firearm regulations are bad. But we also know many responsible gun owners who may not agree with our politics but are NOT trigger happy, paranoid, racist loons.   Ergo there is no excuse for Kelly's abysmal ignorance.]

Then look at Hooker Pappy Fetzer and his initial "theory" about the shootings:

Mossad death squads slaughtered American children at Sandy Hook

Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:27PM
By Dr. James H. Fetzer
The choice appears to be covertly revealing, where “Sandy” means guardian of men (as an allusion to guns) and “Hook” as a euphemism for hooking, gathering or confiscating the only weapons that DHS fears. And who better to slaughter American children than Israelis, who deliberately murder Palestinian children?
Anti-Semitism was always at the heart of the Sandy Hook Hoax conspiracy.  So it isn't a surprise racists like Kristine Kelly and Holocaust Deniers like Austin Ashe are involved. 

In our humble opinions this is the Hooker base the architects of the Hooker conspiracy are playing to.  They played to them hard last year under the cover of second amendment rights, when the white power American Third Position Party(renamed American Freedom Party] sponsored Gun Appreciation Day. in the wake of legislation in response to the Sandy Hook shootings.  This is what makes us believe most of this conspiracy woo around Sandy Hook is invented to emotionally whip up a fringe right base.

Not to say other gullible schmucks won't get sucked into the orbit of the Hooker event horizon.  But when you have the Hooker granddaddy on record as a Holocaust denier,
 [Jim Fetzer's Reasons to Believe in Holocaust Denial]

 and  vocal Hookers as Holocaust deniers,

then it becomes hard to rationalize the Sandy Hooker Conspiracy as anything but a front for political groups friendly with Holocaust denial.  Ignoring that puts anybody just further up that river in Egypt.

The Hookers are fronting people with nasty fringe political agendas.  If peeps like Erik Pearson really are just duped goombahs, they better snap out of it before their lives are completely ruined by conspiracy crazies.

Anyway, visit the "Sandy Hook Truth Exposed":  link, like, follow and look for it on our sidebar links soon.

Hooker Hypocrisy for the FAIL

Hookers are obviously liars and conartists.  But who knew they were whining babies?

Okay, okay, we had a clue...remember what's her face who proudly posted as a Hooker at Facebook under her own name?  Then made vague threats, then deleted her comment when she realized she sounded like a retard?

Well, the rest of the Hookers seem to have forgotten the vicious harassment and stalking campaigns against Gene Rosen and the surviving families.  See, it's okay to call grieving parents actors and paid shills and claim children who were murdered are really alive and singing at the superbowl, but, watch out if you name the peeps inventing these sick lies.  The Hooker will make a this:

ALERT - Sandy Hook Blog Outing Truthers
Free Agent Media·32 videos
Published on Mar 6, 2014
When I saw this it almost made my blood boil. This blog is actually posting the private information of Sandy Hook truthers and their families in an effort to get people to harass them.

 Does he mean like GENE ROSEN?

In the aftermath, Rosen, 69, was interviewed by many of the media outlets that descended on the small community, and his anguished face flashed across television screens around the world.
The sincerity of that anguish was questioned by a group of conspiracy theorists who call themselves "truthers," Salon reported earlier this month. These truthers have so far posted Rosen's personal information online, created fake social media accounts using his name and harassed him via email and phone.

So the Hookers can cry us a fucking river.  We're telling people to be POLITE about shaming these hooker clowns. 

The moron doing voice over says we outed Erik Pearson.  Which is sorta true, but mostly not since he made it really really outing himself on his real Facebook page:


The video isn't academy award material, but these are Hookers.   Comments are noteworthy showing irony impairment  is epidemic among hookers:

1 hour ago
Good to know they feel intimidated and waste their time, attempting to expose the "truther's". I loved Erik's response which basically stated to just ask him next time, he has nothing to hide. At this point, they only look deeply desperate and extremely pitiful. Thanks for the vid FAM.
Free Agent Media
1 hour ago
I hope you're right Kate, for all our sake!
Free Agent Media
44 minutes ago
Erik's response was awesome.
Zach Siltanen
1 hour ago
Get everyone that you know with some kind of hacking ability and hack them back into oblivion
Hide replies
Free Agent Media
1 hour ago
If we could somehow get Anonymous involved, they are more than capable. But I wouldn't have a clue how to reach out to them.
ug mold
1 hour ago
Why bother, it looks like a pathetic effort anyway.
Free Agent Media
1 hour ago
Yea, seems to look that way.
Lynda Whiting
22 minutes ago
I believe this is the guy who was stalking me for a couple weeks. He "featured" me in one of his blogs. I ignored him.
1 hour ago
I listed it as harassment and explained that they have gone after "truthers" and listed links, name, personal information. I also let them know that they plan on doing the same with others and have even asked others to do the same.
View all 3 replies
59 minutes ago
+Free Agent Media I responded to the other comment. That blog is ridiculous.
Free Agent Media
57 minutes ago
Definitely ridics! Lets hope it's just rhetoric and keep an eye on them.
1 hour ago
I just reported them. Maybe others should as well.
View all 4 replies
1 hour ago
+Radmc02 I meant to say Don't click on personal information unless they specifically mention yourself personally. Sorry
Free Agent Media
56 minutes ago
Thanks for the info!
Free Agent Media
2 hours ago
What's going on here?

Okay, to reply to a few "points":

1. "Free Agent Media
1 hour ago
I hope you're right Kate, for all our sake!"

Get over yourself, conspiracy loon.  You're not in any danger from anyone, because there is no hooker conspiracy.

2."Zach Siltanen
1 hour ago
Get everyone that you know with some kind of hacking ability and hack them back into oblivion"

Oh man, had to stop reading for a good five minutes to stop laughing.  Ask us why, lol.

3."Free Agent Media
1 hour ago
If we could somehow get Anonymous involved, they are more than capable. But I wouldn't have a clue how to reach out to them."

Anonymous will not be helping any Hooker.  Trust us on this one:

 Jesus H Christ. How can people be so stupid and cruel?

Lynda Whiting
22 minutes ago
I believe this is the guy who was stalking me for a couple weeks. He "featured" me in one of his blogs. I ignored him.

Like most Hookers, Lynda is a liar.  She has never been featured here...though that could change.

1 hour ago
+Radmc02 I meant to say Don't click on personal information unless they specifically mention yourself personally. Sorry

Also, make sure you haven't frigging released your own info yourself while pushing Hooker bs:

Hooker Papa Fetzer

Jody Paulson

Lori Price

Wolfgang Halbig

Vivian Lee

Sofia Smallstorm
James Tracy

Eric Pearson

Fuck, these peeps are PROUD "Hookers".  Only reason we can think they're so open about it.  

Why all the whining? Imagine if we were claiming their families were fake by picking apart photos these dumbasses have uploaded to Facebook for EVERYONE TO SEE...then they'd have something to cry about.

Update:  More Hooker Lies...whoduhthunk?
[edit: commenters have pointed out the Hooker might be confusing us with another blog, because the Hookers have so much fail there's plenty to go around.]

Michael Sinko

28 minutes ago
They had my comments and a link to my profile. I emailed the administrator to remove my name and he responded "fuck you"  What a prick! 
The facts:
1. This is the first time we've heard of Mike or his comments...anywhere.
2.  We've had no emails from Hookers...because we don't have an email contact for the blog.  Duh.  
3. Therefore we are not responsible for the "fuck you" reply Mikey got from where ever, assuming he didn't make it all up. However if someone did tell Mike to fuck off, we sympathize with them.


Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Grief Police: Only Hookers know the "right" way to grieve

And now from a great thread from Gawker pwning  Hooker's critiquing survivor's grieving:

65 participants